 |
1. By purchasing foreign oil we are sending immense sums of
money to countries that fund those that would seek to harm us.
Some of these countries (or those funded by interests within them)
are a threat to global security. Keeping our energy dollars domestic
will not only inject needed cash into our own economy but hopefully
undercut some funding sources for those that would threaten us.
The US spends nearly $700 Billion per year on foreign oil. This number
will obviously fluctuate wildly based on the current price of oil,
but no matter which way you slice it, that is a lot of money to be
sending to parts of the world that may not like us very much.
Also, if you believe the Iraq War was somewhat influenced by our interest
in oil in the Middle East you can add another $600 Billion to that
total, as that is what we have spent in Iraq to date. Keep in mind,
that by the time we are done that number will likely well exceed $1
Trillion. To take the argument even one step further if you believe
that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are able to operate almost entirely
based on funds received from sources related to oil production you
can bring the total cost of the "War On Terror" to almost
$4 Trillion when you include Afghanistan, homeland security, 9-11
rebuilding, etc. One can argue that the War on Terror would have been
necessary anyway even if we didn't spend what we do on foreign oil,
however I think most would agree that they would rather keep their
money in America rather then send it to areas where they love our
money but hate our values.
Suffice it to say, hopefully you are getting the picture that this
about more than $2 or $4 gas. The cost of using foreign oil, particularly
from the Middle East - is far too high. The $4 trillion number used
above translates to over $13,000 for every man woman and child in
America. We don't know how much you drive, but it is probably a safe
bet that that is far more than you spend on gas in a year ;-) (average
gas bill per person in the US is actually closer to $1200)
Some may argue that this argument is far too abstract and places too
much emphasis on how oil dollars do or do not contribute to global
insecurity, and for those we understand your apprehension. We do not
know what a world that is not addicted to oil would look like. It
may be safer, or maybe not, however we do know what we have now and
are pretty sure it can get better. If nothing else, we have the proven
capacity of producing all the natural gas we need domestically whereas
that is not the case for oil. 99% of the natural gas we use in the
US is from domestic sources whereas only 30% of the oil. We would
much rather have our money go to domestic natural gas producers in
any of the 32 producing states like Texas, Louisiana, Wyoming and
New Hampshire than foreign countries such as Iran, Venezuela and Saudi
Arabia. |
| |
2. New Jersey is one of the most polluted states in the
country.
Global
warming is real and threatens the earth. Using gasoline powered
vehicles is one of the primary sources of pollution to our environment.
Table 1: New Jersey
2001 Primary Pollutants (tons/year)
|
|
co |
nh3 |
nox |
pm10 |
pm25 |
so2 |
voc |
allpol |
| Fuel Combustion - Electric Util. |
3,045 |
108 |
34,331 |
3,805 |
3,249 |
52,171 |
1,363 |
98,072 |
| Fuel Combustion - Industrial |
4,246 |
214 |
16,486 |
2,771 |
2,147 |
23,146 |
9,116 |
58,126 |
| Fuel Combustion - Other |
94,379 |
439 |
31,104 |
15,198 |
14,820 |
24,849 |
28,335 |
209,125 |
| Chemical And Allied Product Mfg. |
1,505 |
20 |
4,147 |
655 |
621 |
2,555 |
3,468 |
12,971 |
| Metals Processing |
2,258 |
0 |
444 |
179 |
172 |
68 |
1,089 |
4,210 |
| Petroleum And Related Industries |
505 |
0 |
2,333 |
404 |
309 |
5,239 |
1,147 |
9,937 |
| Other Industrial Processes |
1,658 |
10 |
1,197 |
3,009 |
2,662 |
672 |
6,990 |
16,199 |
| Solvent Utilization |
330 |
3 |
482 |
119 |
119 |
153 |
111,201 |
112,406 |
| Storage And Transport |
243 |
3 |
1,744 |
289 |
282 |
591 |
11,389 |
14,541 |
| Waste Disposal And Recycling |
9,339 |
3,480 |
2,253 |
5,913 |
4,707 |
2,892 |
22,922 |
51,506 |
| Highway Vehicles |
1,541,915 |
6,999 |
179,300 |
4,766 |
3,434 |
4,193 |
117,457 |
1,858,064 |
| Off-Highway Vehicles |
724,647 |
73 |
56,827 |
5,651 |
5,187 |
6,346 |
69,274 |
868,006 |
| Miscellaneous Sources |
8,719 |
5,130 |
188 |
93,822 |
15,684 |
48 |
482 |
124,073 |
Nonattainment area is a locality where
air pollution levels persistently exceed National Ambient Air Quality
Standards, or that contributes to ambient air quality in a nearby
area that fails to meet standards. Designating an area as nonattainment
is a formal rulemaking process, and EPA normally takes this action
only after air quality standards have been exceeded for several
consecutive years. Nonattainment areas are given a classification
based on the severity of the violation and the type of air quality
standard they exceed.
EPA designations of nonattainment areas
are only based on violations of national air quality standards for
carbon monoxide, lead, ozone (1-hour), particulate matter (PM-10),
and sulfur dioxide.
Table
2: New Jersey Non Attainment Areas and Pollutants
| County |
Pollutant |
Region- Severity |
| Camden
Co |
Ozone
|
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton,
PA-NJ-DE-MD - Severe-15 |
| Cumberland
Co |
Ozone
|
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton,
PA-NJ-DE-MD - Severe-15 |
| Essex
Co |
CO
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - Moderate >
12.7ppm |
| |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Gloucester
Co |
Ozone
|
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton,
PA-NJ-DE-MD - Severe-15 |
| Hudson
Co |
CO
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - Moderate >
12.7ppm |
| |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Hunterdon
Co |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Mercer
Co |
Ozone
|
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton,
PA-NJ-DE-MD - Severe-15 |
| Middlesex
Co |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Monmouth
Co |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Morris
Co |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Ocean
Co |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Passaic
Co |
CO
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Moderate
> |
| |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Salem
Co |
Ozone
|
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton,
PA-NJ-DE-MD - Severe-15 |
| Somerset
Co |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Sussex
Co |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Union
Co |
CO
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT - Moderate >
12.7ppm |
| |
Ozone
|
New
York-N. New Jersey-Long
Island, NY-NJ-CT - Severe-17
|
| Warren
Co |
SO2
|
Warren
Co, NJ - Primary, Secondary |
This may not be a surprise to many as they
drive down the NJ Turnpike in North Jersey, but our air quality
leaves something to be desired. Even in other parts of the state
where we have green trees and farms we may have a false sense of
security, but almost all of NJ has been designated a non-attainment
area due to a moderate to severe accumulation of pollutants. As
you can see in Table 1 above - the vast majority of these are generated
from highway vehicles.
Natural gas as a transportation fuel is
not perfect. It is a fossil fuel and it does cause pollution. However
the point is that it causes dramatically less pollution than burning
gasoline. For example the Civic GX CNG is rated the cleanest production
vehicle in the world by the EPA. It is 90% cleaner than the average
gasoline powered vehicle. We would love to be promoting electric
or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, however they are still far away
from being ready for the big time. There are huge technical hurdles
that people much smarter than us are working on, and our hope is
that some day that is how we will be powering our vehicles. Hydrogen
and electric cars are still the future, however natural gas vehicles
are ready for today.
There are significant voices out there
who see natural gas vehicles as an unhealthy compromise on the environment.
They argue that it takes our eye off the prize, and is simply trading
a bigger sin in for a slightly lesser one. We understand their frustration.
What we hope to show them is that this is not a love affair with
CNG. It is simply a means to an end. We need to do something right
now and CNG is the only viable option to gasoline right now. If
you have the technical skills to make better batteries, please continue
the good work. Do not pay attention to what we are trying to do
with CNG, we do not want to distract your good efforts. However
for the 99.99% of the rest of us who want to do something rather
than wait another 10 or 20 years, lets start pushing the current
best and only alternative to gasoline, CNG....and for the Hydrogen
contingent, if you have done any research you already know that
the best thing possible for Hydrogen technology is a flourishing
CNG transport industry. Virtually every technology related to CNG
has a direct application to a future Hydrogen fueled world. Both
natural gas and Hydrogen are gases at room temperature and need
to be stored, compressed and transported in the same way. Almost
every technology breakthrough for CNG would be a breakthrough for
Hydrogen as well. That is why CNG is also referred to as a "bridge"
technology. It is a potential "bridge" to a hydrogen future. |
| |
3. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) has been used in vehicles for over
70 years. It is a primary transport fuel in many foreign countries,
however NJ residents have no access to it. There are ZERO public
access CNG filling stations and ZERO CNG vehicle purchasing or conversion
options.
This is somewhat of a chicken and
egg dilemma whereby nobody is going to build fueling stations if
there are no cars and nobody is going to build the cars unless there
is a way to fuel them. One cannot exist without the other and nobody
so far has taken the initiative to provide both at the same time.
We are going to try our best to change that.
As everyone has recently experienced, gasoline prices have taken
extreme swings. The shock of $4 gas is still fresh for most everyone,
however the recent reductions have come as a welcome surprise in
difficult economic times. The important point is that no matter
where gasoline prices are natural gas is almost always cheaper.
Natural gas is almost always roughly 30% -50% cheaper than a gallon
equivalent of gasoline at any time. At $4 per gallon you can expect
to fill up on CNG from anywhere from $2-$3 per gallon equivalent.
At $2 gasoline CNG could be as low as $1 per gallon equivalent!
It's domestically produced, it keeps money in America and away from
those that threaten us, it's cleaner and it's cheaper. If you are
a patriot it makes sense, if you are green it makes sense, even
if you just want to save some money at the pump it makes sense.
The only reason not do it is indifference. Come on NJ, we think
once you understand all the facts, it becomes pretty clear that
there is no reason to wait any longer. CNG is available now, and
we should do what we can to bring it to New Jersey!
To get an idea of exactly how bad the problem is in NJ check out
this
link to the Department of Energy's Alernative Fueling Station Locator.
Select Compressed Natural Gas as the type of fuel and then put in
any address in NJ. If you look for all stations you will see a handful
of stations from PSEG, NJDOT and the Port Authority. However if you dig
a little deeper you will see that ALL of these are private and not
open to the public. Once you do an advanced search and filter for
only public stations you will see our current sad state of affairs...a
big conspicuous blank area over all of NJ.
|
|